Biomarkers in chronic graft-versus-host disease: quo vadis?

Biomarkers are increasingly used for diagnosis and treatment of transplant-related complications including the first biomarker-driven interventional trials of acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). In contrast, the development of biomarkers of chronic GvHD (cGvHD) has lagged behind due to a broader variety of manifestations, overlap with acute GvHD, a greater variation in time to onset and maximum severity, and lack of sufficient patient numbers within prospective trials. An international workshop organized by a North-American and European consortium was held in Marseille in March 2017 with the goal to discuss strategies for future biomarker development to guide cGvHD therapy. As a result of this meeting, two areas were prioritized: the development of prognostic biomarkers for subsequent onset of moderate/severe cGvHD, and in parallel, the development of qualified clinical-grade assays for biomarker quantification. The most promising prognostic serum biomarkers are CXCL9, ST2, matrix metalloproteinase-3, osteopontin, CXCL10, CXCL11, and CD163. Urine-proteomics and cellular subsets (CD4+ T-cell subsets, NK cell subsets, and CD19+CD21low B cells) represent additional potential prognostic biomarkers of cGvHD. A joint effort is required to verify the results of numerous exploratory trials before any of the potential candidates is ready for validation and subsequent clinical application

Haematopoietic SCT in severe autoimmune diseases: updated guidelines of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

In 1997, the first consensus guidelines for haematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in autoimmune diseases (ADs) were published, while an international coordinated clinical programme was launched. These guidelines provided broad principles for the field over the following decade and were accompanied by comprehensive data collection in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) AD Registry. Subsequently, retrospective analyses and prospective phase I/II studies generated evidence to support the feasibility, safety and efficacy of HSCT in several types of severe, treatment-resistant ADs, which became the basis for larger-scale phase II and III studies. In parallel, there has also been an era of immense progress in biological therapy in ADs. The aim of this document is to provide revised and updated guidelines for both the current application and future development of HSCT in ADs in relation to the benefits, risks and health economic considerations of other modern treatments. Patient safety considerations are central to guidance on patient selection and HSCT procedural aspects within appropriately experienced and Joint Accreditation Committee of International Society for Cellular Therapy and EBMT accredited centres. A need for prospective interventional and non-interventional studies, where feasible, along with systematic data reporting, in accordance with EBMT policies and procedures, is emphasized

Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe autoimmune diseases in children : a review of current literature, registry activity and future directions on behalf of the autoimmune diseases and paediatric diseases working parties of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Although modern clinical management strategies have improved the outcome of paediatric patients with severe autoimmune and inflammatory diseases over recent decades, a proportion will experience ongoing or recurrent/relapsing disease activity despite multiple therapies often leading to irreversible organ damage, and compromised quality of life, growth/development and long-term survival. Autologous and allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) have been used successfully to induce disease control and often apparent cure of severe treatment-refractory autoimmune diseases (ADs) in children. However, transplant-related outcomes are disease-dependent and long-term outcome data are limited in respect to efficacy and safety. Moreover, balancing risks of HSCT against AD prognosis with continually evolving non-transplant options is challenging. This review appraises published literature on HSCT strategies and outcomes in individual paediatric ADs. We also provide a summary of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Registry, where 343 HSCT procedures (176 autologous and 167 allogeneic) have been reported in 326 children (<18 years) for a range of AD indications. HSCT is a promising treatment modality, with potential long-term disease control or cure, but therapy-related morbidity and mortality need to be reduced. Further research is warranted to establish the position of HSCT in paediatric ADs via registries and prospective clinical studies to support evidence-based interspeciality guidelines and recommendations

Nonpharmacologic Treatment of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease in Children and Adolescents

Transplantation and immunomodulatio

Management of growth failure and growth hormone deficiency after pediatric allogeneic HSCT: Endocrinologists are of importance for further guidelines and studies.

Growth failure (GF) is a frequent problem after pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) occurs in 20 to 85%, but published data on the efficacy of growth hormone treatment (GHT) are conflicting. Currently, there are no recommendations on screening for and treatment of GHD after HSCT. We aimed to describe the management of endocrine follow-up (FU)and details of GHT within European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) centers. In a retrospective questionnaire study, all EBMT centers performing pediatric HSCT were invited. Results were evaluated in correlation with the structure of endocrine aftercare (HSCT-clinicians and endocrinologists). The majority of centers (80%) reported endocrine FU by an endocrinologist - either within the HSCT-center or in a separate endocrine clinic. Fifty-four percent reported FU outside of the HSCT-center. As diagnostic tests the insulin-like growth factor IGF-I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein IGFBP3, insulin tolerance test and arginine stimulation test were most frequently used. Sixty-four percent of centers performed GHT and endocrinologists were more likely to prescribe GH (74%) compared to HSCT-clinicians (33%). The most frequent indication for GHT was GHD in 60%, with a distinct different approach of endocrinologists in comparison with HSCT-clinicians. Our study reveals substantial variation in practice and emphasizes the need for endocrine aftercare performed by dedicated endocrinologists in close collaboration with the HSCT-center. Our results indicate that the management of GHT depends on the structure of endocrine aftercare, which is important for the future development and distribution of studies and guidelines